PRINCIPAL'S ACTIONS THROUGH DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP DIMENSIONS: A CASE STUDY OF TWO PUBLIC SPANISH SCHOOLS

Abstract

Experience has shown that the attitude of the person assuming the management functions in the school is a key and decisive element in the quality of the change processes in the school. Of these ideas is born, the concept of distributed leadership (DL). The research design is a case study. The main objective is to understand the four dimensions of DL and the actions of the Principal through representative cases of two schools. The techniques used to collect information were documentary analysis, questionnaires, in-depth semi-structured interviews, and observation. An analysis of the data and conclusions are provided.

Author Biography

Ingrid del Valle García, Pablo Olavide University, Sevilla, Spain.
Ingrid García is a PhD in Social Science and Psicologist from Pablo Olavide, Seville, Spain. Distributed Leadership, Organization management and, in particular, Public Principals school of Madrid are the main areas of her scientific research. These have also been the focus of her numerous scientific and professional papers and international congress. Ingrid García has years of experience as university professor and also as executive positions. She is working now on the school ´s distributed leadership , influenced by technology, the crushing processes of globalization, changes in laws and programs, innumerable conflicts social and curricula, uncontrolled immigration and inequalities. The kind of research is descriptive, quantitative and qualitative methods and cases are used.

References

Arias, A. and Cantón, I. (2006). Leadership and management of educational centers. Barcelona: Davinci Continental.

Bennett, N. (2003). Distributed leadership Full report. United Kingdom: Nottingham. National College for School Leadership.

Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269.

Bolívar, A., and San Fabián, J. (2013). LOMCE: A new law to improve educational quality? Or-ganization and Educational Management, 21(1), 7-11.

Day, D. (2000). Leadership development: a review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 581–613.

DeFlaminis, J., Abdul-Jabbar, M., and Yoak, E. (2016). Distributed leadership in schools: A prac-tical guide for learning and improvement. New York: Routledge.

Educa Madrid (2018). http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?pagename=PortalEducacion/ Page/EDUC_home

Elmore, R. (2005). Accountable leadership. The Educational Forum (6) 2, 134-142.

García, I. (2018). Perceptions of schools’ principals through distributed leadership: case study of two public Spanish schools. Revista Lusófona de Educação 1(7):33-61.

García, I. (2019). El liderazgo distribuido y la percepción de los equipos directivos de las escuelas públicas de educación primaria madrileñas.(Tesis doctoral). Pablo Olavide University, Spain.

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed Leadership. Second International Handbook of Educational Lead-ership and Administration, 1(2) 653-696.

Hargreaves, A., and Fink, D. (2000). The Three dimensions of reform. Educational Leadership 57(7), 30-34.

Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: what we know. In: Harris, A. (ed.), Distributed Leader-ship: Different Perspectives (pp. 49-68, Ch.3). Dordrecht: Springer.

Harris, A. (2012). Distributed leadership: implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7-17.

Harris, A., and DeFlaminis, J. (2016). Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education, 30(4), 141-146.

Hulpia, H., Devos, G., and Van Keer, H. (2009). The influence of distributed leadership on teach-ers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Re-search, 103(1), 40-52.

Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., and Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: DfES/NCSL.

Leithwood, K., and Seashore-Louis, K. (2011). Linking leadership to student learning. San Fran-cisco: John Wiley y Sons.

Pont, B., Nusche, D., and Moorman, H. (2009). Improve school leadership: policy and practice. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ross, J., and Berger, M. (2009). Equity and leadership: Research-based strategies for school leaders. School leadership and management, 29(5), 463-476.

Spillane, J. (2012). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Spillane, J. (2017). Leadership and Learning: Conceptualizing Relations Between School Admin-istrative Practice and Instructional Practice. In: How School Leaders Contribute to Stu-dent Success (pp. 49-67, Ch 2). Springer International Publishing.

Spillane, J., and Diamond, J. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers Col-lege Press.

Spillane, J., Camburn, E. and Pareja, A. (2007). Taking a Distributed Perspective to the School Principal’s Workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103-125.

Stake, R. (2013). Qualitative / naturalistic research: epistemological problems. Education and Selection, 7(1), 19-27.

Published
2020-01-12
How to Cite
García, I. del V. (2020). PRINCIPAL’S ACTIONS THROUGH DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP DIMENSIONS: A CASE STUDY OF TWO PUBLIC SPANISH SCHOOLS. The International Education and Learning Review, 1(2), 101 - 110. Retrieved from https://journals.epistemopolis.org/learner/article/view/1967
Section
Artículos